Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 04046
Original file (BC 2008 04046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
ADDENDUM 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04046 

 COUNSEL: 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty of 
“Adjustment Disorder” be changed. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

RESUME OF CASE: 

 

On 15 Sep 04, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force 
Reserve with an uncharacterized, entry level separation for 
Personality Disorder. He served 22 days on active duty. 

 

In an application dated 9 Nov 09 [sic], AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2008-04046, the applicant requested that his narrative reason of 
Personality Disorder be changed. On 26 Aug 09, the Board 
directed the applicant’s records be corrected to show that he was 
discharged with a narrative reason for separation of “Adjustment 
Disorder” rather than “Personality Disorder,” and a separation 
code of “JFY” rather than “JFX.” For an accounting of the facts 
and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the 
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit E. 

 

By letter dated 25 Aug 11, the applicant provided additional 
evidence and requested reconsideration stating that when he 
learned his fiancé was pregnant he wanted to fulfill his duties 
as a spouse and father, so he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve 
as a heavy equipment operator. 

 

In Aug 04, after he entered Basic Training, he phoned home and 
learned that his fiancé had left him. His fiancé stated she had 
no intention of becoming a military spouse or having his child. 
He was heartbroken, saddened, shocked, confused and felt 
betrayed. He was unable to adapt because he was away from his 
family. He was desperate to return home and convince his 
pregnant fiancé that they could work it out. He was ill advised 
by his peers and made a serious mistake when he stated “he could 
harm himself.” Consequently, he was processed and released from 
the Air Force. 

 


To this day, he regrets his poor choice to listen to his peers 
who were also immature. He now understands he could have 
received help from the Air Force and been encouraged to continue 
his career. He would like closure and to have his record 
cleared. 

 

Over the past seven and one-half years he has achieved a solid 
career in Aviation by attending flight school, college, and other 
curricular activities. After his discharge from the Reserve, he 
joined his local fire department and completed training in 
becoming an Emergency Medical Technician/Firefighter. 

 

His experienced a huge transformation in a short time. He 
dedicated hundreds of hours to his local community, performed 
volunteer Fire Department work at a local hospital and completed 
an Internship as an Aerospace Educational Speaker for the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA). He received his first degree in 
Criminal Justice and has continued his education by enrolling in 
an aeronautics program at Farmingdale State College. He will 
graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in Aviation 
Administration with a minor in Piloting. He has a Private Pilot 
License, Instrument Rating and has almost completed his 
Commercial Pilots License. 

 

His personal life is well. He recently married in Jun 2011 and 
has a stable, supportive and loving marriage. His wife is 
currently in Afghanistan serving in the Air Force. He and his 
wife share the same values and desire for professional 
achievement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an error or an injustice. While the narrative 
reason for separation and reentry (RE) code assigned to the 
applicant are technically correct and in accordance with the 
governing Air Force Instructions, we believe it would be an 
injustice for the applicant to continue to suffer its effects. 
The Medical Consultant has advised us that an Adjustment Disorder 
is often temporary and resolves once the stressor is removed. 
Based on the applicant’s newly submitted documentation, it 
appears his diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder has resolved and we 
believe his narrative reason for separation should be changed to 
remove the stigma. While the applicant has not requested his RE 
code be changed, the documentation also supports changing his RE 
code to allow service reentry if he desires, as the applicant 
appears to have adjusted well to his new life since the events of 


2004. Whether or not he is successful will depend on the needs of 
the service and our recommendation in no way guarantees that he 
will be allowed to return to the armed forces. In view of the 
above, we believe it is in the interest of justice to change the 
separation code and narrative reason to the more favorable code 
of "KFF" and narrative reason of "Secretarial Authority" along 
with an RE code of “3K” and furnished an Honorable Discharge 
certificate. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 15 Sep 04, he 
was discharged by reason of “Secretarial Authority,” with a 
separation code of “KFF” and a reentry code of “3K.” 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 28 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the record as indicated. The 
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2008-
04046: 

 

 Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings dated 10 Sep 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit F. DD 149 dated 31 Oct 11 w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04046

    Original file (BC-2008-04046.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04046 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation, on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of “Personality Disorder” be changed. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900911

    Original file (9900911.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 Sep 98, applicant was notified by his commander that she was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The records indicate the applicant’s military service was properly reviewed and appropriate action was taken. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Special Programs & BCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, also reviewed this application and indicated that a review of the applicant’s case file was conducted and the RE code is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802473

    Original file (9802473.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02473 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to active duty or his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow him to reenlist in the service. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 23 Sep 98. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02296

    Original file (BC-2004-02296.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 30 May 2001, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s requests to change the narrative reason and authority for his separation and to change his RE code (Exhibit C). Applicant has not submitted evidence of any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge, nor provided facts warranting a change to the narrative reason for his separation or RE code. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02620

    Original file (BC-2009-02620.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation for Personality Disorder and issued a separation code of JFX and an RE code of 2C on 25 Sep 02. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02386

    Original file (BC-2010-02386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02386 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed be to a code that will allow him reentry into military service. Prior to 2003, the Services...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02954

    Original file (BC-2005-02954.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02954 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 May 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03882

    Original file (BC-2002-03882.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The reason for the commander’s recommendation was the applicant’s evaluation and diagnosis by the Behavioral Analysis Service with Axis I: Phase of Life Problem, maladjustment to military service, disqualifying severity. At the time the applicant was evaluated and diagnosed by mental health personnel with the unsuiting condition leading to his discharge, the evaluating psychiatrist noted that the applicant was “experiencing a temporary problem that should be “resolvable” within the next six...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03017

    Original file (BC 2012 03017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her narrative reason for separation does not have an effect on her RE code, as her RE code is driven by her involuntary discharge and honorable character of service. However, by a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of a change to the reentry code. AFPC/DPSOR has admitted that her discharge reason for separation and the corresponding separation code should be corrected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01582

    Original file (BC-2007-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this case, the applicant exhibited many signs of Personality Disorder and although not specifically identified by mental health providers while on active duty, his combination of depression, relationship problems, and adjustment disorder approximates a Personality Disorder diagnosis, which was frequently used at that time for those who had adjustment disorder alone. The mental health providers at that time also noted that the applicant was capable of performing his duties and hence, no...